Monday, August 22, 2016

Supporting the Needs of All Learners





Supporting the Needs of All Learners

Mary Scott

EDU 697 Capstone: A Project Approach
               Instructor: Keith Pressey

August 22, 2016



Supporting the Needs of All Learners


As I reflect on my personal experiences, learning in prior courses and the discussion of week two my understanding of meeting the need to planned according to students’ abilities. Reflecting on my personal experiences, I have observable students struggling to comprehend instructions that are given by their instructors. I am one of those students. What maybe simple to one students can be complex to another. Struggling bring about challenges through those struggles. I have found out that collaboration can help.

In prior courses I have learn that learning theories can be used to focus on behavior environment that effect students learning. Skinner theory focuses on the behavior and environment. The use of technology can change the way students think and learn (Reiser &Dempsey, 2012). We are living in the technology age and the learning environment must match the age which students are living in. No one size can fit all in the 21st century. To meet each student’s level of learning, learning should be shifted from teachers to the students using technology learning tools.

Technology can help to meet student’s needs individually. Educators can use technology to present information and lessons using different formats to match students learning styles (Hall, Strangman, & Meyer, 2003). Students can become independent learners. Constructivist teaching allows students to become part of their learning. Schools are falling to meet student’s needs. This is because they are operating on the one size fits all approach. Student’s needs should be and is the schools main focuses.

Personalized learning can determine students learning needs and interests. My redesigned prior MATLT activity will demonstrate the three principles of Universal Design for Learning (1) (1) support recognition learning, provide multiple, flexible methods of presentation; (2) support strategic learning, provide multiple, flexible methods of expression and apprenticeship; and finally, (3) to support affective learning, provide multiple and flexible options for engagement (Strangman & Meyer, 2003). This is a method for creating instructions that I have found that helps to meet each student’s needs. This can reduce barriers.  Combined with the PLO 3 to “design learning opportunities that apply technology-enhanced instructional strategies to support the needs of all learners” each student will benefit.

I will redesign the activity from EDU 655, “Implementing E-Learning Solutions”.  MindMesiter is mind mapping and presentation software (MindMesiter, 2016). MindMesiter will allow me to share information with students as a group or individually. Here I can work one on one when students need it. I can decide who can edit the map or only view it. I will help students to understand the benefits of e-learning.

 I will provide them with information through the use of MindMesiter and PowerPoint. In many studies it have should that student’s academic growth is higher where teachers present learning regularly through the use of technology (Hamiton, 2007).The use of the MindMesiter offer individual and cooperative learning groups to see and plan as it line up. Because a lot of students only have the use of their mobile phone, the mind map can be easily assessed by the use of smartphones. They can learn as the travel. I will present different types of e-learning using the mind map. Some of these e-learning are mobile learning, standalone courses and virtual classroom courses.

Demonstrations of how virtual classroom courses operate will be done through the use of a PowerPoint presentation. Teacher will use social media as a way of communication with students. Here students will experiences in collaborative. My presentation with the use of PowerPoint will encourage students to respond to instructor through social media when there is an assignment is due about the presentation. This is done for those students that will be working in groups to avoid freeloader. Each group member will have a specific part to do to complete the project.

Most students that attend college will encounter some type of e-learning. These are high school students. This cans them to prepare for college. Social media will act as discussion posts for students and teacher. Collaboration tools like Jing, audio chat and YouTube will be introduced in the MindMesiter presentation. The use of these technologies will be presented to show how they can enhance learning, not to be the main focus of the learning.

Some students may have special needs. My skills about the use of technology will help me to choose the appropriate assistive technology to accommodate their needs. To do this teacher need to know: what do they want the technology to do? What can the technology do for the students? What skills do the students need to use the technology tool? How would it affect the students learning (Alberta Education, n.d). These questions can help teacher to use the technology more effectively.

MindMesiter maybe to advance for some students to understand, to accommodate this I will implement the same information and learning experiences using videos and audio. With the use of these tools students can revisit at any time.  They can pause and replay for better understanding. Students will learn through the instructor presentation that e-learning requires motivation and self-discipline. In essence students will present or demonstrate their learning through a choice of a blog, Jing and YouTube. Or they can use a technology learning tool that they are familiar with.

They will be required to explain how beneficial e-learning can be for them. In their assignment they will have to choose a type of e-learning that they are interest in. Here they will apply their understanding of my presentation about e-learning. They are required to do research on their own. To help students to understand the learning the presentation will be based on the learning theories cognitive and social.

When educators implement a lot of use of technologies in learning they need to be prepared for some issues and challenges. Students do not learn on the same level. Allowing students to have a choice in their learning can eliminate some of the challenges. Another challenge was my literacy about the technology tools and their uses. Getting students involve can be a challenge. The unknown can may some students feel out of place in their learning. Students are more involved when they become part of the learning. Keeping students focus on the learning goal instead of the technology tool can be a challenge.

In conclusion, the more students are involved using technology in our society today. This will help prepare them for the 21st century. Week Two Discussion allow educator to understand that one size fit all is for the traditional way of teaching. This assignment helps me to understand the importance of designing to support the needs of all learners. The more technology skills that educator have in implementing technology into their curriculum plan the better they are prepare to teach our students in the 21st century. The activity that I redesign will prepare students for e-learning experiences.





References

Alberta Education, ( n.d). Leveraging Technology. Retrieve from



Hall, T., Strangman, N., & Meyer, A. (2003). Differentiated instruction and implications for UDL implementation. Wakefield, MA: National Center on Accessing the General


Hamilton, B. (2007).  Integrating Technology in the Primary Grades.

           Retrieve from: http://www.iste.org/docs/excerpts/itsele-excerpt.pdf


Horton, W. (2012). E-Learning by design (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Wiley

MindMeiter, (2016). Mind Map Editor. Retrieve from:

https://www.mindmeister.com/mind-map-features


Reiser, R. & Dempsey, J. (2012). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson












The original assignment

Implementing E-Learning Solutions

Mary Scott

EDU 655 Trends & Issues Inst. Design & Tech. Online Learning

Instructor: Dr. Lisa Marie Johnson

November 30, 2015



Implementing E-Learning Solutions

There are lots of complex definitions for e-learning. E-learning is defined as the use of electronic technology to create learning experiences (Horton, 2012). Some say that e-learning is limited to taking place within a web browser without the need for other learning resources. New students take the course often without interacting with instructor or their peers (Horton, 2012). There are different kinds of e-learning. Some e-learning can be done solo. This is what we call a standalone course.

 Another one is the popular mobile learning. You can learn while on the move. This can be done through the use of a smart phones and tablet devices. They learn by interacting with the world around them. As they move alone the way (Horton, 2012). Virtual classroom course is another e-learning. Here they are online courses like a regular classroom course.

 Students have reading assignment, presentation, homework and social media (Horton, 2012). Collaboration is an important aspect of life. Students need to experience in collaborative. This will help them to learn to work as a team and still learn individually. If students do not learn to be a part of team work they can become a freeloader. Team base learning provides opportunities for students to develop their collaboration skills (Reiser & Dempsey, 2012).

Students can learn from each other and their surroundings. The uses of collaborative tools allow students to explore, share, and engage and to connect (Lomas, 2008). All of these tools allow students to learn a group. All of this comes through the use of technology. Collaboration tools should promote communication, share ideas, allow interaction and to be easy to use and learn .The ability to communicate and interaction between people are the most important features of a collaboration tool. Audio-conferencing, conference system and video conferencing are at the list for collaboration tools (Lomas, 2008).

Technology has enhanced learner’s communication skills. Online classes benefit from technology. That is because it provides communication, collaboration and interaction. Collaboration tools like Jing, audio, chat and video chat can foster communication and interaction among students and instruction. With the use of Skype which is an application that students to collaborate over voice channel by calling one another (Lomas, 2008). Students can use their computers as phones.

Technology is a tool to enhance learning. It is not to be the learning. To use technology effective to enhance learning require careful section of technology for purpose. Some students may need specialized technologies. This requires the skills to choose the appropriate assistive technologies for specific learning needs (Alberta Education, n.d). Because of the 21st century skills requirements, the ability to use the bases skills of the computer is required. To enhance students learning through technology, they need to know the basis use of the computer.

The ability to use the computer effectively can motivate students to explore other options. One option is how to use the computer to enhance their learning activities, rather than tacked on (Alberta Education, n.d). When teacher implementing technology into their curriculum plan teacher need to know: what do they want the technology to do? What can the technology do for the students? What skills do the students need to use the technology tool? How would it affect the students learning (Alberta Education, n.d). These questions can help teacher to use the technology more effectively.

The use of videos and audio clips with technology can allow students to revisit anytime and as many time is needed. The use of technology can enhance communication and build a virtual environment that creates a sense of belonging. Technology makes possible for students to connect, share information and ideas in real-life context (Alberta Education, n.d). Best practices for media use allow educator or help educator to use the media literacy concepts and techniques to interpret copying doctrine of fair use. Fair use gives the right to use copyright material without permission or any payment under circumstance (CMSI, 2015). Teachers use media to convey facts and informal. Most teachers use lesson plan formats and charts from the internet.

They can access these materials under the code of best practices. It helps educators to use media literacy and techniques to access the copyright doctrine of fair use. The code of best practices let teachers know the limit of fair use right. It tells how it applies in certain situation (CMSI, 2015). The educational fair use applies to material used in educational institutions and for educational purpose (Stim, 2010). A lot of the hand-outs that teachers use in the class are obtained through the fair use guidelines. It only permits teachers to make one copy. They will than photocopy the article and hand it out (Stim, 2010).

Workbooks and standardized tests cannot be photocopy by teacher. Education publisher do not consider this fair use. The rule of proportionality asks educators to use only what they need to accomplish their goals. The code has flexibility it adapts to technological changes which is changing rapidly (Boulton, 2009). Virtual courses are self-paced learning. This kind of learning setting is part of the education that students are engaging in the 21st century. The uses of the skills that are needed for virtual courses, along with technology are the skills needed to succeed in current and future jobs (NACOL, 2006).

Teachers that are teaching in these virtual classrooms need to make sure that the students possess with the necessary skills to compete as citizens and workers in the 21st century. The self-directed learning that is obtained from virtual courses. Students must master the skills to use appropriate technologies, analyze and present information to process effectively in school, life and work setting (NACOL, 2006). Many of the strategies that are used to complete traditional courses can be used to complete virtual courses. Motivation is the key to complete both. Students must be motivated and have self- discipline to learn in a virtual educational setting. Students have to deal with a lot of independent study.

Virtual courses are more demanding. Students need to have a strong level of motivation. Any little distractions or behind schedule can cause you loss motivation. According to Reiser, (2012), Motivation is critical at three levels, motivation to learn, motivation to work and the last one is volition or self-motivation and self-regulation. As an online student encouraging yourself can help you to overcome challenges that you will face. These three levels of motivation can enhance student’s ability to achieve their educational goals. Managing virtual courses can depend on student’s knowledge, skills and aptitude. All of these characteristics can determine what a student can do (Reiser, 2012).

In virtual classrooms teachers need to know how they are going to communicate with these students. With the use of technology there are many ways they can communicate. Some of the ways are e-mail, blogs, text and etc.. They need to re-read their messages when they are communicating with the use of technology. Once they hit the send button the message is gone. Teachers want their students to interpret the message correctly. Misinterpreted message can cause to fail in their assignments (Davis, 2009).

Instructors should get to know their students through the introduction at the first beginning of class. Students and teacher can get to know each other by sharing personal information formally and informally. Online teaching strategies can be organized by three components. There are (1) planning and development (2) teaching in action and (3) students assessment and data evaluation (HANOVER RESEARCH, 2009). Teach should match their educational technologies and course management tools that are available with their subject. The technology is just the tool for learning, not the learning.

Planning comes before selecting the technology tools.  The learning should objective should be clear and tangled targeted verbs should be to obtained the outcomes of the assignment. Students need to know what is expected of them through the use of effective objectives. The online classroom should foster interactive. To promote interactive the use of pedagogical techniques like online discussion forums and students collaboration on assignments (HANOVER RESEACH, 2009). The only different between a traditional classroom setting and virtual setting is that virtual is without the building (Lobera, 2010).

The teachers that teach in virtual classroom do require extra training. The training is needed because the teacher’s activities are monitored and electronically recorded in online platform (Lobera, 2010). Teachers recognize the class as a group. Yet, they are in different locations across the world. Teachers can respond quickly and provide feedback as a group or individually. Because of the lack of training for instructor some useful technologies than can enhance their learning and the students has gone misused and underused (Tremblay, 2006).










References

Alberta Education, ( n.d). Leveraging Technology. Retrieve from



Boulton, C. (2009). THE CODE OF BEST PRACTICES IN FAIR USE FOR MEDIA LITERACY EDUCATION. Afterimage, 37(2), 63-65. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/212058969?accountid=32521


CMSI, (2015).Empowering Media That Matters. Retrieve From:

    http://www.cmsimpact.org/fair-use/related-materials/codes/code-best-practices-fair-use-media-literacy-education

Davis, M., (2009). Managing Instruction in a Virtual World. Retrieve from:

http://www.edweek.org/dd/articles/2009/06/30/04neccvirtual.h02.html


HANOVER RESEARCH, (2009). Best Practices in Online Teaching Strategies. Retrieve from:

     http://www.uwec.edu/AcadAff/resources/edtech/upload/Best-Practices-in-Online-Teaching-Strategies-Membership.pdf


Horton, W. (2012). E-Learning by design (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Wiley

Lobera, K. (2010). Characteristics and attributes of virtual teachers: A training perspective (Order No. 3409189). Available from ProQuest Central. (613817490). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/613817490?accountid=32521


Lomas, C., (2008).Collaboration Tools. Retrieve from:

      https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI3020.pdf


NACOL, (2006). Virtual Schools and 21st Century Skills. Retrieve from:

       http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/VSand21stCenturySkillsFINALPaper.pdf


Reiser, R. (2012).  Trends and issues in instructional design and technology. 3.  

Pearson Publishing

Stim, R., (2010). Educational Uses of Non-coursepack Materials. Retrieve from:

      http://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/academic-and-educational-permissions/non-coursepack/

Tremblay, T., (2006). Technical Evaluation Reports. Retrieve from:

    http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/309/486

No comments:

Post a Comment